« Pass the Potatoes | Main | Sundials »

June 09, 2005

Ritual Hash

Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about ritual, trying to understand how I define it and what role it plays in my life.  I’ve been reading some interesting stuff on the topic.

One guy defines rituals as “repetitive human activities that reduce the raw and seemingly random stuff of experience to manageable proportions” (Aidan Kavanagh in Roots of Ritual).  I like this definition because it admits that reality doesn’t come in nice packages.  It’s messy and chaotic and on its own doesn’t make much sense a lot of the time.  Rituals help us feel like we can handle that.  Through some of my most difficult seasons, it’s been mundane tasks (rituals) that have helped keep me sane:  exercise, washing dishes, preparing food, morning and evening hugs.  I’ve a hunch kids need routines every bit as much as adults do for this same reason; in a world like ours, we all need tactile things we can trust, expect, and depend on.

Sages in the Vedic tradition take this thought even further.  They say creation is always only begun.  As humans, we’re like artists handed roomfuls of media:  pens and pencils, canvas, clay, all assortments of colors and paints and brushes.  And all we’re implicitly told is, “Go for it.  Make something of it.”

In cosmological terms, what is merely procreated by the creator god is not a cosmos or a universal whole made up of ordered parts.  The origins of true cosmos are found not in this primary generative act but rather in a secondary operation – a ritual act that lends structure and order to a chaotic creation…[Rituals are] the workshop in which all reality is forged (Brian Smith in Reflections on Resemblance, Ritual, and Religion).

This way of seeing ritual resonates well with my recent thoughts on religion.  In many ways, religions seem like offspring of this “secondary operation.”  Every artist is different; even if working with the same materials, each one creates something unique.  And this is true of those sharing similar worldviews, as well as those inhabiting entirely different cultures, geographies, languages, contexts.  The reality forged by an ancient, disillusioned Indian prince will be quite different than the one forged by a Semitic prophet, or a Roman king.  And too the rituals established to sustain those realities.

I’ve been thinking about the rituals in my life and in the culture around me, asking what reality they’re creating and propping up.  I’m not a member of a religious community per se, but I participate daily in rituals that for all intents and purposes are religious.  Is consumerism not a type of religion?  Or science, or novel-writing? Or marriage, friendship, pregnancy?  Each part of my life has a set of assumptions and values and beliefs and expectations that I share with people beyond myself.  Each one has rituals to sustain such things.

But here’s the rub (isn’t there always one of these?):  a life of devotion to this many “religions” begins to feel a lot like chaos again.  For all the rituals involved, order, as created by each “religion,” can only go as far as the boundary of each “religion.”  When my religions are all on relatively equal terms, which voice do I listen to?  Whose reality gives me that necessary comfort that all is not chaos, that over-arching, undergirding meaning can be found?  Or created.

I miss the simplicity of my childhood faith, and the ways it so completely ordered my universe.  I miss nestling into rituals created by other people who I trusted understood the cosmos fully and had full grasp of Life and God and humanity.  In many ways, I miss being a child. Is it not the blessing and curse of a mindful, adult life to find peace with the fact that nobody knows it all; that owning one’s faith and values takes time and a lot of hard work; that no matter what big groups of people say, there still exists an inner Voice, beckoning us to be and say and become who we uniquely are?

Catherine Bell says rituals can create a form of “redemptive hegemony able to exercise some dominance over other activities in the world” (Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice), and maybe that’s what I’m looking for.  A “redemptive hegemony” I can trust.  A redemptive hegemony that can help me make order from the chaos of my little life.

10:01 AM in Psychology, Religion/Spirituality | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83456ddf869e200d83449104453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ritual Hash:

Comments

I have been thinking about the difference between ritual and routine. I haven't consulted a dictionary, but it seems to me that much of what has taken on the sense of ritual started out as routine of necessity. I used to get up at 5 every morning because of the time it took to get ready for work, which started at 7:15. Getting ready included eating breakfast, drinking coffee, reading and praying, etc. Now that I am "semi-retired" I often don't have work at 7:15; but somehow that morning routine still feels good to me. It has become a ritual that gives a sense of order to my day.

Church has become one of those routines for which the original meaning has changed. I have found over the years that the credes and dogmas of the Christian faith are not believable. Many of the prayers and songs of corporate worship are no longer true expressions of my soul. Yet the ritualized activity of church attendance and the friendship of church members continues to provide an order to my social life that I am very relucatant to give up.

Certainly my life's rituals are more relaxing than when they were routines of necessity. There is no fear that breaking the routine will have some terrible consequence, and when they cease to have an ordering value in my life I will feel free to change or leave them. But by changing the routines of necessity to rituals, I have been able to reclaim the "simplicity of my childhood faith", at least to an extent.

Posted by: roger | Jun 12, 2005 10:05:24 AM

i feel homesick in this way, too, kristin.
it was easier when i was seven and everything could be explained completely and entirely by the faith of my loving parents.

Posted by: jen lemen | Jun 12, 2005 8:17:11 PM

Roger, thank you for your reflections. I like the distinction you're implying between routines and rituals, rituals having some other, some special kind of quality to them. What is that quality? I keep wanting to name it for some reason. Maybe it doesn't need to be named. Maybe it's enough to know it when you experience it.

And yes, Jen. Right there with you.

Posted by: Kristin | Jun 14, 2005 9:56:09 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.